[ Field data / Case studies / Northwild ]

Case study · Carbon removal

Proving 41,000 tonnes of carbon in Scottish peat

Proving 41,000 tonnes of carbon in Scottish peat

Proving 41,000 tonnes of carbon in Scottish peat

Northwild rewetted 6,200 hectares of drained Highland peatland. Terrapulse measured what the restoration actually stored — and it was more than the models predicted.

● Flow Country, Scotland · 2023–2026

The project

Challenge, approach, result

Challenge, approach, result

Challenge, approach, result

Northwild needed carbon numbers a buyer would pay full price for — not a default estimate sold at a discount.

41k

tCO₂e verified

6,200

Hectares rewetted

±5%

Uncertainty

+32%

Credit price premium

Project facts

Client

Northwild Land Trust

Location

Flow Country, Scotland

Ecosystem

Blanket bog (peatland)

Period

2023 – ongoing

Area

6,200 ha across 6 catchments

Partners

Independent verifier · regional rangers

Written by

Ines Varga

Lead Ecologist, Terrapulse

Project facts

Client

Northwild Land Trust

Location

Flow Country, Scotland

Ecosystem

Blanket bog (peatland)

Period

2023 – ongoing

Area

6,200 ha across 6 catchments

Partners

Independent verifier · regional rangers

Written by

Ines Varga

Lead Ecologist, Terrapulse

Published 12 May 2026

·

8 min read

Summary

Between 2023 and 2026, Northwild restored 6,200 hectares of drained blanket bog in Scotland’s Flow Country. Its carbon credits had been valued with a default peatland model that carried ±38% uncertainty, so buyers discounted them heavily. Terrapulse installed a network of flux towers, water-table loggers and soil plots to measure what the restoration actually did. After three years, the measured benefit was 41,000 tCO₂e at ±5% uncertainty — 28% more than the model predicted — and the credits sold at a 32% premium.

The site

The Flow Country is the largest expanse of blanket bog in Europe. Peat here has built up over 8,000 years, locking carbon into waterlogged soil where dead plants never fully decompose. From the 1970s, large areas were ploughed and drained for forestry. Drainage lowers the water table, oxygen reaches the peat, and stored carbon escapes as CO₂ — a drained bog can emit 10–20 tonnes of CO₂ per hectare every year.

Northwild’s 6,200 hectares span six catchments: two former forestry plots where the trees had been felled, and four areas of open bog crossed by 412 km of drainage ditches.

The problem: a number nobody trusted

Restoring peat is well understood: block the ditches, raise the water table and let sphagnum moss return. Proving how much carbon that saves is much harder. Registry default models estimate emissions from broad condition categories — “drained” or “rewetted” — rather than measuring them, so they come with wide uncertainty bands.

For Northwild, that meant every credit carried a large discount. Buyers priced in the worst case, and the project was selling credits for roughly 60% of what comparable measured credits fetched.

We knew the restoration was working — you could see the bog coming back. We just couldn’t prove it in a way a buyer would accept.

— Elena Marsh, Project Director, Northwild

What we measured

Before a single ditch was blocked, our field team installed a baseline network. Stations were placed by stratified sampling, so every land type was represented in proportion to its area:

  • 12 flux towers — eddy-covariance systems measuring CO₂ and methane exchange every 30 minutes

  • 340 water-table loggers — recording depth below the surface every hour

  • 420 soil cores — sampled to one metre and repeated each autumn

  • 18 acoustic monitors — tracking birds and insects as an indicator of habitat recovery

Open bog in the eastern catchment, one year after rewetting.

All data streams to the Terrapulse platform, where it is quality-checked, gap-filled with our open-source pipeline (v2.4) and linked to satellite imagery to scale results across the whole site.

What the data showed

Water tables responded fast. Within six weeks of ditch blocking, mean depth rose from 34 cm below the surface to 9 cm — close to the level of an intact bog. By the second summer, net CO₂ emissions across the rewetted areas had fallen by 74%.

Over three years, the site avoided and removed 41,000 tCO₂e, against a default-model estimate of 32,000. Our figure carries ±5% uncertainty; the model’s carried ±38%.

Metric

Default model

Measured

Net carbon benefit (3 years)

32,000 tCO₂e

41,000 tCO₂e

Uncertainty

±38%

±5%

Mean water-table depth

Not measured

−9 cm

Methane change after rewetting

Assumed +40%

+18%

Methane was the biggest surprise. Rewetted peat produces some methane, and default models assume a large increase. Our chambers measured a much smaller rise — 18% rather than 40% — because water tables settled just below the surface instead of flooding it.

What didn’t go to plan

Two of the 340 loggers failed in the first winter, and a storm in January 2024 damaged a flux tower in the western catchment, leaving a five-week gap. We filled it using neighbouring towers and widened the uncertainty for that period. Both issues are disclosed in the verification report.

The former forestry plots also recovered more slowly than open bog. Felled brash left on site kept water tables lower for longer, so Northwild has since mulched those areas.

The result

An accredited verifier audited the raw flux data, processing code and calculations in early 2025 and closed with no major findings. With measured, low-uncertainty results, Northwild sold its first issuance at a 32% premium to modelled credits, and two buyers signed forward agreements for the next five years.

What’s next

Monitoring continues for the full 30-year crediting period. In 2026 Northwild is extending the network to a further 2,400 hectares, and its data is helping recalibrate the regional default peatland model — so other projects benefit from measured results too.

[ In their words ]

“For the first time, a buyer asked to see our data instead of discounting our estimate.”

“For the first time, a buyer asked to see our data instead of discounting our estimate.”

“For the first time, a buyer asked to see our data instead of discounting our estimate.”

Elena Marsh

Elena Marsh

Project Director, Northwild

Project Director, Northwild

[ Side by side ]

Modelled vs. measured

Modelled vs. measured

Modelled vs. measured

Default model

Default model

—

±38% uncertainty on every tonne

±38% uncertainty on every tonne

±38% uncertainty on every tonne

—

Credits sold at up to a 40% discount

Credits sold at up to a 40% discount

Credits sold at up to a 40% discount

—

Annual estimates with no field data

Annual estimates with no field data

Annual estimates with no field data

Terrapulse

Terrapulse

✓

±5% uncertainty from direct flux data

±5% uncertainty from direct flux data

±5% uncertainty from direct flux data

✓

Credits sold at a 32% premium

Credits sold at a 32% premium

Credits sold at a 32% premium

✓

Live water-table and flux dashboards

Live water-table and flux dashboards

Live water-table and flux dashboards

Timeline

Three years, four milestones

Three years, four milestones

Three years, four milestones

From the first baseline reading to the first verified credits.

01

2023 · Baseline

Towers and loggers installed before a single drainage ditch was blocked.

02

2023 · Rewetting

412 km of ditches blocked; water tables rose to the surface within weeks.

03

2024 · Calibration

Site models retrained on 18 months of flux data — storage came in 28% above the default.

04

2025 · Verification

Independent audit closed with no major findings and the first credits were issued.

FAQ

About this project

About this project

About this project

01

Why did the measured figure beat the model?

Why did the measured figure beat the model?

Why did the measured figure beat the model?

Default models assume slower water-table recovery than Northwild’s ditch blocking achieved.

Default models assume slower water-table recovery than Northwild’s ditch blocking achieved.

02

Who verified the result?

Who verified the result?

Who verified the result?

An accredited third-party verifier audited the raw flux data and the calculations.

An accredited third-party verifier audited the raw flux data and the calculations.

03

Is the data public?

Is the data public?

Is the data public?

Summary results and the verification report are public; raw data is shared with buyers on request.

Summary results and the verification report are public; raw data is shared with buyers on request.

04

Will monitoring continue?

Will monitoring continue?

Will monitoring continue?

Yes — the towers stay in place for the full 30-year crediting period.

Yes — the towers stay in place for the full 30-year crediting period.

Your project next

Measure your own restoration

Start with a pilot catchment and publish results you can stand behind.

Your project next

Measure your own restoration

Start with a pilot catchment and publish results you can stand behind.

Your project next

Measure your own restoration

Start with a pilot catchment and publish results you can stand behind.

Continuous, science-grade measurement for the people restoring, protecting and sourcing from living landscapes.

Get in touch ›
© 2026 Terrapulse. All rights reserved.Built for living systems

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.